Thursday, 5 October 2017

Renault’s enduring Clio seeks to endear in its latest form


Mid-life refreshers are de-rigueur across the new car scene, writes Iain Robertson, and most involve little more than updated lamps and handles, although improving a model that is already sound can be a tough job.
The model life cycle is a crucial consideration in the modern motor industry. In fact, it is such a vital aspect in new car design that its timing is something planned into what is a highly competitive market. Even rival manufacturers will attempt to wheedle out from each other, over a series of departmental lunches that involve sales, marketing, design and engineering personnel gathering information by the most devious means, to ensure that product launches obtain the maximum amount of ‘free space’. These are spy games par excellence.

The days of creating automotive icons, a word that I truly loathe, mainly because it is bandied about by indolent, phone-tapping youths, who simply know no better, while not exactly long gone, is a potential treasure trove that few carmakers have struck in recent times. One of the last of them was probably the Volkswagen Beetle, which coursed through its life with minimal variation for nigh on 65 years. They don’t make ’em like that any more (and some would thank the Good Lord for small mercies).
Yet, verging close to that description is the Renault Clio, a model that has been a mainstay of the French carmaker’s line-up since 1990 but has endured just four major iterations over that time, with each version lasting for around eight to nine years, with at least one mid-life upgrade enhancing the retail proposition to each of the Marks. The Mark Four Clio I have on test has just undergone its re-adjustment plan, so you know that it will take around four to five years before it is replaced more comprehensively.

When this model emerged in 2012, it was the first of the non-Le Quement designs for a number of years. The company’s former design boss, famous for the ‘shaking that ass’ Megane, had been sacked ignominiously in the previous year. Laurens van den Acker, who had been coaxed from Mazda to join Renault, took on the task of gifting fresh inspiration to the Clio and anyone, who recognised his design signature, would have spotted it, not least in the launch Flame Red colour, a version of which he had already applied to Mazda concept cars previously and remains a £625 extra charge item on this test example.
While the days of ‘Nicole and Papa’, who were central to the advertising transition of the first Clio, from the former Renault Five, in 1990, are but a distant memory, largely unknown to today’s 20-somethings, it is the car itself that has become the focal attention. Intentionally voluptuous, with well-defined haunches and sensual ‘curviness’ in abundance, it sold in excess of an outstanding 400,000 examples worldwide in 2015, a result that highlights its popularity.

It remains a particularly attractive design, which makes mid-life revisions surprisingly difficult for the styling team. Yet, Renault has managed to retain its image and vitality, without detracting too far from the original. However, it is clear that a bag of additional safety enhancements, for which Renault has usually been an innovator, will have to wait for the Mark Five to arrive. As a result, this version of the Clio is devoid of distance cruise control, semi-autonomous emergency braking and even lane control, equipment that most of its rivals now incorporate.
While I am not unhappy about these omissions, asking £18,240 for a 900cc five-door hatchback is a rich price tag that will take some justification on Renault’s part. I should point out that £1,000 of that price is for the Renault R-Link multimedia system that includes front, rear and lateral sensors, a rear parking camera and a hands-free, parallel and perpendicular parking aid. The additional tinted rear glazing costs £250, while the get-you-home spare wheel adds £100. I have already mentioned the premium charged for the paint job, added to the £16,265 base price. Renault needs to be careful, even in these days of very few punters renting, rather than actually ‘owning’ their cars, that it does not price itself out of contention. It is dangerous territory.

Having enjoyed personally a bumper period of sampling virtually every one-litre triple power unit from the motor industry, Renault’s alternative may be 10% smaller than the norm but it is no less vibrant. Developing a turbocharged 90bhp and driving through a five-speed manual transmission, it is pretty much average for the class. It emits a modest 105g/km, which is a tad more than most of its rivals, but it does boast a top speed nudging 113mph and can crack the 0-60mph benchmark in a whisker off 12.0 seconds, again, up to the class average.
Sadly, as the test car seemed to have a hair-trigger throttle, even attempting to hold a steady speed, whether through town, or out on the main roads, it was too frustrating on our bumpy, potholed road surfaces to be anything less than staccato, accompanied by plenty of glottal stops, as Clio sung its otherwise pleasant song. Thankfully, a smooth ride quality, a long-held benefit of French motorcars, is retained in this Dynamique S TCe model, because, were it any less resilient, the resultant, bump-induced throttle surge would have been intolerable. In some respects, it felt as though the engine’s ignition timing was too advanced, as kicking in the turbocharger occurred rather too easily.

Interestingly, this showed up in the average fuel return of the test period. Even equipped with ‘stop:start’ technology, its 60.1mpg posted Official Combined figure is someway off the actual. On my customary 50-miles test route, the Clio gave a moderate 49.7mpg measured brim-to-brim. However, driving like that is not really feasible in daily traffic, where it was a less frugal 43mpg, almost a third less than the posted figure, which is not a good reason to contemplate a Clio TCe 90.
However, it is a comfortable wee thing, offering plenty of space for two six-footers up-front, although those behind will suffer a degree of discomfort. Both driver’s seat and the steering column offer a wide range of adjustment. The ‘soft-touch’ dashboard, with its technical finish, looks and feels very presentable and, being devoid of banks of switches, as most of the minor controls are accessed via the R-Link touch-screen, the design is clean and unencumbered. In this respect, the Clio is a charming sub-compact.

In this trim, it is also quite well-equipped. On the technical front, it features both stability and traction controls, as well as a brake pedal-induced hill-start assist. In typical Renault form, a card-type key can be either kept in the pocket, or introduced to an appropriate slot in the lower dashboard, alongside the pushbutton starter. Walk away from the Clio and its locks its doors automatically. The car’s headlamps can illuminate automatically, just as rain-sensing wipers will clear the screen without driver intervention. The new double-optic headlamps provide a strong pool of light ahead of the car at night-time, offering decent range on full-beam.
The 17-inch, black and alloy wheels look great, offset by the black and chrome-lipped sill extensions and the rear diffuser built into the back bumper, which adds a soupçon of sportiness to an otherwise rudimentary machine. This subtle edge is carried into the interior, where the cloth covered seats feature grey and red leatherette inserts for added interest.

Overall, the latest version of the Clio is not majorly altered over its original outline, which means that Renault must be raking in the profits for a most durable piece of design. It is covered by a four years/100,000 miles manufacturer’s warranty and servicing packages (typically being £459 for three years/30,000 miles) ensure that running costs can be kept within visible bounds.


Conclusion:   As much-beloved as the Renault Clio is, the company is really making you pay the price for brand and model loyalty! This version of the Clio could serve purpose as either a private, or business acquisition and competitive PCPs and lease deals are available. However, there are significantly better value, new cars in the market, by which even an ardent Renault aficionado is likely to be tempted.


Article source: http://b-c-ing-u.com/2017/04/10/renaults-enduring-clio-seeks-endear-latest-form/

2017 Renault Trafic Crew goes dual-purpose


Renault has given its tradie-trusted Trafic van a more family-friendly feel with a second row of seats that takes the new Crew variant capacity to six occupants including the driver, while leaving 4.0 cubic metres of cargo volume in the back and a 1060kg maximum payload.


The new version is based on the 103kW twin-turbo 1.6-litre diesel long-wheelbase Trafic but adds a second row of three individual seats with full three-point belts at a cost of 2.0 cubic meters of load bay volume for $42,990 before on-road costs – an increase of $3500 over the equivalent three-seater.
In addition to all of the three-seater’s gear, the Crew gets glazed sliding doors for second row occupants, a glazed bulkhead behind the extra seats, a pair of 49-litre storage boxes with extra pockets, a 12-volt socket and interior finishing to match the front row.
The French maker is offering an equipment-boosted Premium Pack for the base Crew that adds 17-inch alloy wheels, body-coloured bumpers and exterior mirrors, as well as deadlocks, an 800-amp battery, upgraded multimedia system with 7.0-inch touchscreen, navigation and Arkamys stereo and heated driver’s seat.
Like higher-grade versions of the Trafic van, the $2490 Premium package also adds the ‘mobile office’ features that include a tablet holder and premium dashboard with laptop storage, but not the folding middle seat that converts into a desktop.
The Renault Trafic has been a great seller for Renault in Australia.
At the top of the Trafic Crew pile, a Lifestyle variant adds opening windows for the rear passengers, chrome grille highlights, a gloss black badge surround, a hands-free entry card (as found in many Renault passenger cars) and automatic climate control for $46,780.
With the extra seating and reduced load area, Crew variants can still accommodate items measuring up to 2423mm long, 1662mm wide and 1387mm in height.
All versions are sold with a standard six-speed manual gearbox with no automatic option at this stage, as is the case with the more strictly commercial van variants.
At the launch of the Trafic in May 2015, Renault said it would “work towards” an auto option, but the company is yet to reveal if it is making progress with an automatic that would doubtless appeal to a broader audience in Australia.
Despite its self-serve transmission, the Trafic performed well in the 2.5 to 3.5 tonne van segment during 2016, finding 1730 buyers and sitting in fourth place behind the Toyota HiAce (7478), Hyundai iLoad (5467), and Volkswagen’s Transporter that finished last year with a tally of 1960 sales.
Renault light commercial vehicles senior model line manager Lyndon Healey said the company had been pleased with the Trafic since its introduction, and the new Crew options would further broaden its appeal.
“The Trafic has been a great seller for Renault in Australia,” he said. “The Trafic Crew brings another level of functionality to what is already a highly capable and increasingly popular alternative to more mainstream mid-size van offerings."
Article source: https://www.carsguide.com.au/car-news/2017-renault-trafic-crew-goes-dual-purpose-51468